Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for link-layer header type (XRA)

2018-01-31 Thread Bruno Verstuyft
Hi, can I already commit the dissector code for the XRA header to wireshark, or is it best to wait for finalization of the spec details? Best Regards, Bruno 2018-01-24 16:09 GMT+01:00 Bruno Verstuyft : > Updated the spec with the latest clarifications. > > > 2018-01-21 0:42 GMT+01:00 Bruno Ver

[tcpdump-workers] Returned mail: see transcript for details

2018-01-31 Thread guy
The original message was received at Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:30:37 +0800 from alum.mit.edu [217.182.232.29] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - - Transcript of session follows - while talking to lists.tcpdump.org.: >>> MAIL From:g...@alum.mit.edu <<< 501 g...@alu

[tcpdump-workers] Returned mail: see transcript for details

2018-01-31 Thread gerald
The original message was received at Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:06:05 +0800 from wireshark.org [200.161.96.48] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sa

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for link-layer header type (XRA)

2018-01-31 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 31, 2018, at 6:07 AM, Bruno Verstuyft wrote: > can I already commit the dissector code for the XRA header to wireshark, or > is it best to wait for finalization of the spec details? At this point, I don't have any further questions; are there any more changes you intend to make to the sp