On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:42 AM, Anton Glukhov wrote:
> I've been working for IEEE802.1Qbu Frame Preemption Protocol and now it's
> part of TSN set of protocols. I would like to propose the new link type and
> sent this proposal to tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org, but unfortunately no
> response
Hi there!
I finally got around to fixing my cloned repo again to get the TravisCI compile
tests working, and have added some tests for my requested flags. I was
wondering if I could get feedback on my branch, or if it was good to be pulled.
It’s been merged with the latest version of your maste
On Nov 29, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Bruno Verstuyft wrote:
> thanks for the remarks. The specification is now updated with more
> clarifications
So "Segment Header Present" is 1 if it's present and 0 if it's absent?
Type 75 is still labeled as "ODMA REQ" rather than "OFDMA REQ". Also, it says
"ODMA
On Nov 30, 2017, at 2:27 AM, Anton Glukhov wrote:
> 1. You are right, I'm not subscribed there. I will fix this problem)
OK, I'm moving the discussion to tcpdump-workers.
> 2. I'd like to have completely separate LinkType number and this is not
> LINKTYPE_ETHERNET, because preamble must be sho
