On 13/11/2013 7:15 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> ...
> Or write your own filter expression that looks at the link-layer header to
> detect IPv6 packets, skips past the IPv6 header (you won't be able to handle
> extension headers, as that involves looping, and the libpcap filter language
> doesn't supp
Darren Reed wrote:
>> Or write your own filter expression that looks at the link-layer
>header to detect IPv6 packets, skips past the IPv6 header (you won't be
>able to handle extension headers, as that involves looping, and the
>libpcap filter language doesn't support that), and
On 15/11/2013 6:26 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Darren Reed wrote:
> >> Or write your own filter expression that looks at the link-layer
> >header to detect IPv6 packets, skips past the IPv6 header (you won't be
> >able to handle extension headers, as that involves looping, and the
Darren Reed wrote:
>> That's cool...
>>
>> > that are chained together in this fashion. In its current form, BPF
>> (v1) is > not that IPv6 friendly. Give me a week or two to back up a
>> design with some > code that works (the parser and compiler bit are
>> the tricky pie
