08.02.2013, 21:55, "Michael Richardson" :
>> "Denis" == Denis Ovsienko writes:
>>> Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and
>>> UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.
>
> Denis> It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am
> Denis> producin
> "Denis" == Denis Ovsienko writes:
>> Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and
>> UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.
Denis> It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am
Denis> producing a sample capture. The ZeroMQ decoding func
> Denis> There are network protocols that have an assigned port
> Denis> number, and there are other that don't or are commonly used
> Denis> on non-assigned ports, such as HTTP on port 8080. Looking at
> Denis> function tcp_print() in file print-tcp.c, it is clear how the
> Den
> Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and UDP layer.
> It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.
Thanks, that seems to be OK to start with.
>
> It would be nice to have a way for each ULP decoders to register their
> name so that it's not so switch() stmt based, and then to have
> "Denis" == Denis Ovsienko writes:
Denis> There are network protocols that have an assigned port
Denis> number, and there are other that don't or are commonly used
Denis> on non-assigned ports, such as HTTP on port 8080. Looking at
Denis> function tcp_print() in file print-tc
