On 30/10/2017 18:50, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
>> https://framapic.org/Z2wN2FpnyNPg/QTrxHAaMFGwG.png
>
> I have just uploaded it, thank you. Looks fine but you may want to make the
> background transparent to make it even better.
Done :)
___
tcpdump-worker
>https://framapic.org/Z2wN2FpnyNPg/QTrxHAaMFGwG.png
I have just uploaded it, thank you. Looks fine but you may want to make the
background transparent to make it even better.
--
Denis Ovsienko
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@
On Oct 29, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I kinda prefer the first one, but I have no strong preference.
I'm OK with either one.
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listi
Denis Ovsienko wrote:
>> https://framapic.org/Z2wN2FpnyNPg/QTrxHAaMFGwG.png
> Well, not bad. Looks OK scaled to 100 by 100 pixels (that's how it will
appear on GitHub).
I kinda prefer the first one, but I have no strong preference.
--
] Never tell me the odds!
Denis Ovsienko wrote:
> Here is the apparently random image GitHub has assigned to the tcpdump
group: https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/4154908?s=200&v=4
> Does it make any sense to anyone?
> Would the following image be better for GitHub purposes?
> http://www.tcpdump.o
>The attachment was probably deleted. Here is a link:
>
>https://framapic.org/Z2wN2FpnyNPg/QTrxHAaMFGwG.png
Well, not bad. Looks OK scaled to 100 by 100 pixels (that's how it will appear
on GitHub).
--
Denis Ovsienko
___
tcpdump-workers maili
On 28/10/2017 22:58, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
> On 28/10/2017 18:36, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
>> Hello list.
>>
>> Here is the apparently random image GitHub has assigned to the tcpdump
>> group: https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/4154908?s=200&v=4
>>
>> Does it make any sense to anyone?
On 28/10/2017 18:36, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Here is the apparently random image GitHub has assigned to the tcpdump group:
> https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/4154908?s=200&v=4
>
> Does it make any sense to anyone?
>
> Would the following image be better for GitHub purpos