On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> > "Guy" == Guy Harris writes:
>Guy> The Makefile has a rule to "generate" it, so I'd see that as
>Guy> OK. (It also means that "make clean" would remove the symlink,
>Guy> which is arguably the right thing for it to d
> "Guy" == Guy Harris writes:
Guy> The Makefile has a rule to "generate" it, so I'd see that as
Guy> OK. (It also means that "make clean" would remove the symlink,
Guy> which is arguably the right thing for it to do.)
>> The other way is to make releasetar: depend upon bpf_f
On Mar 5, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Does anyone see a problem if I move bpf_filter.c from CSRC
> to GENSRC in the libpcap Makefile?
The Makefile has a rule to "generate" it, so I'd see that as OK. (It also
means that "make clean" would remove the symlink, which is arguably
Does anyone see a problem if I move bpf_filter.c from CSRC
to GENSRC in the libpcap Makefile?
The other way is to make releasetar: depend upon bpf_filter.c,
so that the symlink is shipped, but I think we shouldn't ship the
symlink.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!
