Re: [tcpdump-workers] libpcap-1.0.0 sita configure check

2008-11-18 Thread Guy Harris
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: "Peter" == Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Hello. Peter> Currently SITA will be defined and sita code will be tried to Peter> build even if --without-sita is passed to ./configure. Patch Peter> in attachme

Re: [tcpdump-workers] libpcap-1.0.0 sita configure check

2008-11-06 Thread Fulko Hew
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Michael Richardson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Peter" == Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Peter> Hello. > >Peter> Currently SITA will be defined and sita code will be tried to >Peter> build even if --without-sita is passed to ./config

Re: [tcpdump-workers] libpcap-1.0.0 sita configure check

2008-11-06 Thread Guy Harris
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: Applied to new git tree. So the official tree is now in git (i.e., all changes should be checked into git)? - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.

Re: [tcpdump-workers] libpcap-1.0.0 sita configure check

2008-11-05 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Peter" == Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Hello. Peter> Currently SITA will be defined and sita code will be tried to Peter> build even if --without-sita is passed to ./configure. Patch Peter> in attachment fixes this issue. Applied to new git tree. --

[tcpdump-workers] libpcap-1.0.0 sita configure check

2008-11-05 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello. Currently SITA will be defined and sita code will be tried to build even if --without-sita is passed to ./configure. Patch in attachment fixes this issue. With best regards, -- Peter. === modified file 'configure.in' --- configure.in 2008-11-02 09:45:33 + +++ configure.in 2008-11-02 0