On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:12:18PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michal Sekletar wrote:
> >> okay, can we start again. I would appreciate some clear data and
> >> clear complaints.
> >>
> >> This is what I heard: a) which is "master", bpf or github?
>
> > There are c
Michal Sekletar wrote:
>> okay, can we start again. I would appreciate some clear data and
>> clear complaints.
>>
>> This is what I heard: a) which is "master", bpf or github?
> There are commits on github/master which are not on bpf. We already
> have maintenance bran
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:01:11PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> okay, can we start again.
> I would appreciate some clear data and clear complaints.
>
> This is what I heard:
> a) which is "master", bpf or github?
There are commits on github/master which are not on bpf. We already
> c) there is some issue (please explain more) with bpf.tcpdump.org
> experiencing auto-merging difficulties.
When a repository exists in two copies and each copy has the same branch (i.e.
master) and some new commits go to that branch in one copy but not the other,
and also the other way arou
On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> okay, can we start again.
> I would appreciate some clear data and clear complaints.
>
> This is what I heard:
> a) which is "master", bpf or github?
> b) bpf is unreliable.
> c) there is some issue (please explain more) wit
okay, can we start again.
I would appreciate some clear data and clear complaints.
This is what I heard:
a) which is "master", bpf or github?
b) bpf is unreliable.
c) there is some issue (please explain more) with bpf.tcpdump.org
experiencing auto-merging difficulties.
d) t
