On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:18 AM, François-Xavier Le Bail
wrote:
>> From: Guy Harris
>> If we want to ensure that the configuration scripts we ship are generated by
>> a
>> particular version of autoconf, we should remove configure from the
>> repository,
>> add an autogen.sh script to re-gener
> From: Guy Harris
> If we want to ensure that the configuration scripts we ship are generated by
> a
> particular version of autoconf, we should remove configure from the
> repository,
> add an autogen.sh script to re-generate the configure file, and ensure that
> it's run as part of the rel
On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:01 AM, François-Xavier Le Bail
wrote:
> Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.".
>
> The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.".
>
> Is there any risks of regression ?
If we want to ensure that the configuration scripts we ship are generated
> "ois-Xavier" == ois-Xavier Le Bail writes:
ois-Xavier> Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.".
ois-Xavier> The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.".
ois-Xavier> Is there any risks of regression ?
oh, I thought it was updating the other way when
Hello,
Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.".
The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.".
Is there any risks of regression ?
Francois-Xavier
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lis
