So,never mind it is a structure or a typedef,it point to the same memory
address,to use a structure only for it's historical reason like Guy Harris
said?
On 5/7/06, Sebastien Raveau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 06 May 2006 06:18, Lan Qing wrote:
> the struct in_addr have only one vari
On Saturday 06 May 2006 06:18, Lan Qing wrote:
> the struct in_addr have only one variable in it, is there any necessary to
> define a struct like that?
> why not use "typedef in_addr_t in_addr;" directly?
POSIX (the standard for UNIX software) states that: "The header
shall define the in_addr s
Lan Qing wrote:
hello,
I read the fllowing words in the c header file
I.e., the header that came with your OS, not the header that comes with
tcpdump?
/* Internet address. */
typedef uint32_t in_addr_t;
struct in_addr
{
in_addr_t s_addr;
};"
the struct in_addr have only one variable
what is the point ? - the storage space is the same ...
Lan Qing wrote:
hello,
I read the fllowing words in the c header file
"
/* Internet address. */
typedef uint32_t in_addr_t;
struct in_addr
{
in_addr_t s_addr;
};"
the struct in_addr have only one variable in it, is there any necessar
hello,
I read the fllowing words in the c header file
"
/* Internet address. */
typedef uint32_t in_addr_t;
struct in_addr
{
in_addr_t s_addr;
};"
the struct in_addr have only one variable in it, is there any necessary to
define a struct like that?
why not use "typedef in_addr_t in_addr;" d
