At 02:31 AM 5/17/2005, you wrote:
Gcom, Inc. wrote:
We are considering adding support in libpcap to use a windows named pipe
as a capture interface. The other end of the windows named pipe would
present a libpcap file-format stream of data, so relatively little would
need to be done in libpcap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> "Gcom," == Gcom, Inc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gcom> We are considering adding support in libpcap to use a windows
Gcom> named pipe as a capture interface. The other end of the
Gcom> windows named pipe would present a libpcap file-format str
Gcom, Inc. wrote:
We are considering adding support in libpcap to use a windows named pipe
as a capture interface. The other end of the windows named pipe would
present a libpcap file-format stream of data, so relatively little would
need to be done in libpcap to make this work. If we were to
We are considering adding support in libpcap to use a windows named pipe as
a capture interface. The other end of the windows named pipe would present
a libpcap file-format stream of data, so relatively little would need to be
done in libpcap to make this work. If we were to submit this win32-