On Jul 23, 2009, at 9:45 AM, kahou lei wrote:
We will put EOF as well.
The decoding is correct, we have 4 bytes SOF, first byte is 0xBC ,
second
byte is 0xB5 and so on.
OK, I've assigned 225 as DLT_FC_2_WITH_FRAME_DELIMS.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/
We will put EOF as well.
The decoding is correct, we have 4 bytes SOF, first byte is 0xBC , second
byte is 0xB5 and so on.
Thanks,
Kahou
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, kahou lei wrote:
>
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, kahou lei wrote:
We are currently supporting:
SOFi2 - BCB5
...
Also, does, for example, BCB5 mean that the 4 bytes in the SOF
are, in order, 0xBC 0xB5 0x55 0x55, so that the first byte of packe
On Jul 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, kahou lei wrote:
It is not base on RFC 3643. We are following the standard from
http://www.t11.org .
You can find the draft in Fibre Channel (FC) -> FC-FS-3 Fibre
Channel -
Framing and Signaling - 3INCITS Project 1861-D.
Basically, we are following Table 4 Vali
It is not base on RFC 3643. We are following the standard from
http://www.t11.org .
You can find the draft in Fibre Channel (FC) -> FC-FS-3 Fibre Channel -
Framing and Signaling - 3INCITS Project 1861-D.
Basically, we are following Table 4 Valid Data Characters (Section 5.14) and
Table 7 Frame De
On Jul 22, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:17 AM, kahou lei wrote:
In this case, can you assign me one more value for FC with SOF? The
reason
is that our module can send out two type of packets: One with SOF,
one
without SOF.
So what are the contents of the
On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:17 AM, kahou lei wrote:
In this case, can you assign me one more value for FC with SOF? The
reason
is that our module can send out two type of packets: One with SOF, one
without SOF.
So what are the contents of the 4 bytes of SOF?
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
V
In this case, can you assign me one more value for FC with SOF? The reason
is that our module can send out two type of packets: One with SOF, one
without SOF.
I will add one dissector in wireshark to support FC with SOF (If it doesn't
exist).
Thanks,
Kahou
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Guy Ha
On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:41 PM, kahou lei wrote:
Just curious, if the FC packet has 4 bytes SOF in front of R_CTL,
can I use
the same value?
No; DLT values must unambiguously specify the link-layer
encapsulation, so a different DLT value should be used.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
V
Thanks for assigning a new value.
Just curious, if the FC packet has 4 bytes SOF in front of R_CTL, can I use
the same value?
Thanks,
Kahou
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2009, at 6:35 PM, kahou lei wrote:
>
> Yes, the packet starts with the R_CTL field.
>>
>
On Jun 29, 2009, at 6:35 PM, kahou lei wrote:
Yes, the packet starts with the R_CTL field.
OK, so I've assigned 224 to DLT_FC_2 (as it's for Fibre Channel FC-2
frames).
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Yes, the packet starts with the R_CTL field.
Basically my company is making a fibre channel module which can generate
fibre channel packet on the transmit side and we have functionality to
capture the packet on the receive side, this is done on the hardware level.
On the software level, we can que
On Jun 24, 2009, at 9:50 AM, kahou lei wrote:
I would like to request a new DLT value for raw fibre channel. I am
currently working on wireshark to dissect raw fibre channel packet
in data
link layer.
So does "raw fibre channel packet" mean a packet beginning with the
Frame_Header, e.g.
Hi,
I would like to request a new DLT value for raw fibre channel. I am
currently working on wireshark to dissect raw fibre channel packet in data
link layer.
Thanks,
Kahou
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
14 matches
Mail list logo