On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Toeung, Chanthy
wrote:
>> So presumably the first byte of the packet data will be the slave address,
>> followed by the netFn and LUN, followed by the checksum, etc.?
> yes. It is correct.
No, it's not. The test file in this Wireshark bug:
https://bugs.w
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
NOTE: WTAP_ENCAP_ values have no relation to the DLT_ values.
But when i use text2pcap to create pcap format, i need the DLT value,
It's 199, as per my earlier mail.
So beside this, where should i go to modify the new DLT_IPMB that you have just
assigned ?
You d
new DLT_IPMB that you have just
assigned ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:17 PM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a DLT code for IPMB pac
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
One more question, so what is the value of WTAP_ENCAP_IPMB that i should use
for my dissector?
The next value after the last one in wiretap/wtap.h. You will have to
add that to your version of wiretap/wtap.h, and modify the IPMI
dissector to handle that value.
Don't
: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a DLT code for IPMB packet
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
> Does the USB captured mode work in Wireshark?
Yes, if your machine is running Linux with a sufficiently-recent kernel,
and Wireshark is using a top-of-tree version of libpcap. (I'm not sure
which ve
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
Does the USB captured mode work in Wireshark?
Yes, if your machine is running Linux with a sufficiently-recent kernel,
and Wireshark is using a top-of-tree version of libpcap. (I'm not sure
which version of the kernel is required.)
I doubt any distributions use the t
t for a DLT code for IPMB packet
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
>> So presumably the first byte of the packet data will be the slave
>> address, followed by the netFn and LUN, followed by the checksum,
>> etc.?
>
> yes. It is correct.
OK, DLT_IPM
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
So presumably the first byte of the packet data will be the slave
address, followed by the netFn and LUN, followed by the checksum,
etc.?
yes. It is correct.
OK, DLT_IPMB has been assigned the value 199.
Capture type, or DLT_ type?
o: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for a DLT code for IPMB packet
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
> I'm doing a project on creating a plugins of packet IPMB ( with I2C
> interface ) in Wireshark.
>
> Now i need a specific DLT code for this packe
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
I'm doing a project on creating a plugins of packet IPMB ( with I2C
interface ) in Wireshark.
Now i need a specific DLT code for this packet so that i can put my
code in Open Source of Wirshark. Can you please assign me one number ?
So presumably the first byte of the p
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
I'm doing a project on creating a plugins of packet IPMB ( with I2C
interface ) in Wireshark.
Now i need a specific DLT code for this packet so that i can put my
code in Open Source of Wirshark. Can you please assign me one number ?
So presumably the first byte of the p
Toeung, Chanthy wrote:
Dear tcpdump workers,
I'm doing a project on creating a plugins of packet IPMB ( with I2C interface )
in Wireshark.
Now i need a specific DLT code for this packet so that i can put my code in
Open Source of Wirshark. Can you please assign me one number ?
Moreover, Can
Dear tcpdump workers,
I'm doing a project on creating a plugins of packet IPMB ( with I2C interface )
in Wireshark.
Now i need a specific DLT code for this packet so that i can put my code in
Open Source of Wirshark. Can you please assign me one number ?
Moreover, Can you tell me how to add a
13 matches
Mail list logo
