Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patch-question

2007-10-11 Thread Gerrit Renker
Guy, - | > What will happen to the other two | | The other two what?  Patches?  As per my mail: | | >> having submitted three patches last year on this list which were   | >> accepted but | >> apparently never made it into the repository, | > | > No, Hannes Gredler checked them into the

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patch-question

2007-10-10 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Gerrit Renker wrote: So what happens next - I think that the bug fix should go to the other branches as well, since the tool prints the wrong values. The only relevant branch is the x.9 branch (the other branches are dead; nobody's going to make an 0.7.x relea

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patch-question

2007-10-10 Thread Gerrit Renker
Guy, - | > having submitted three patches last year on this list which were | > accepted but | > apparently never made it into the repository, | | No, Hannes Gredler checked them into the main branch near at the end | of 2006 - and acknowledged at least two of them in an e-mail reply

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Patch-question

2007-10-09 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Gerrit Renker wrote: having submitted three patches last year on this list which were accepted but apparently never made it into the repository, No, Hannes Gredler checked them into the main branch near at the end of 2006 - and acknowledged at least two of them

[tcpdump-workers] Patch-question

2007-10-09 Thread Gerrit Renker
Hello, having submitted three patches last year on this list which were accepted but apparently never made it into the repository, I'd like to enquire which format of patch submission is needed here: all patches have now been uploaded to the sourceforge-net patch tracking system (but not assigned