Thanks Guy!
GV
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Harris"
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Memory leak in libpcap (top of tree) and/or
kernel
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I think the routine usb_cleanup_
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I think the routine usb_cleanup_linux_mmap(pcap_t* handle) should be
modified as follows:
...
I'm not too happy about querying again the fd for the RING_SIZE (it
should be stored in the pcap_t structure), but I tried it on my VM
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Harris"
To:
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Memory leak in libpcap (top of tree) and/or
kernel
On Jul 10, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I just discovered an interesting leak with the libpc
On Jul 10, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I just discovered an interesting leak with the libpcap 1.0 or the
current top-of-tree.
On Fedora 10, kernel 2.6.27.5 or 2.6.27.12, there is a memory leak
by which a simple program like this one will eventually use all the
memory on the
Hi all.
I just discovered an interesting leak with the libpcap 1.0 or the current
top-of-tree.
On Fedora 10, kernel 2.6.27.5 or 2.6.27.12, there is a memory leak by which
a simple program like this one will eventually use all the memory on the
system (as reported by top) and eventually the a