Sorry I didn't get around to this until now, but
On Jul 30, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
There is another issue related to these block types.
Fulvio's proposal:
a shb (even corrupted by the ftp transfer) can begin with the following
strings:
\r\n\r\x1A -> 1 reserved block type
\r\
---
From: "Fulvio Risso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gianluca Varenni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:48 AM
Subject: RE: [tcpdump-workers] Fw: new file format
I would like to point out advatanges / disadvatanges of the
two pro
29 luglio 2004 22.13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Guy Harris
> Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Fw: new file format
>
>
> Hi.
>
> I haven't seen any reply to Fulvio's proposal about removing the
> byte order
> magic and using the string "\r\n\r\x1A".
&
eck if the
file is correct and understand its byte order).
Can we decide what is the final block type for the section header block?
Have a nice day
GV
- Original Message -
From: "Gianluca Varenni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 5:
- Original Message -
From: "Fulvio Risso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gianluca Varenni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Guy Harris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Loris Degioanni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Michael Richardson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 11:22 PM
Subject: RE: new file format
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gianluca Varenni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Loris Degioanni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Fulvio Risso"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Michael Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: new file format
