Guy Harris wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Saikiran Madugula wrote:
Yes, I get warning when gencode.c gets compiled with the custom package.
(ofcourse standalone libpcap compiles fine).
gcc -O2 -I. -I
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -D -fPIC
-DPIC -c ./gencode.c
./genc
On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Saikiran Madugula wrote:
Yes, I get warning when gencode.c gets compiled with the custom
package.
(ofcourse standalone libpcap compiles fine).
gcc -O2 -I. -I -
DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -D -fPIC -
DPIC -c ./gencode.c
./gencode.c:87:1: war
Guy Harris wrote:
Saikiran Madugula wrote:
I ran into this problem when I was trying to compile libpcap with a
package which has support for a custom interface in Linux. I get a
warning message about redefining ETHERMTU while compiling that package
as the package uses net/ethernet.h.
Do you
Saikiran Madugula wrote:
I ran into this problem when I was trying to compile libpcap with a
package which has support for a custom interface in Linux. I get a
warning message about redefining ETHERMTU while compiling that package
as the package uses net/ethernet.h.
Do you get a warning messa
> I ran into this problem when I was trying to compile libpcap with a
> package which has support for a custom interface in Linux. I get a
> warning message about redefining ETHERMTU while compiling that package
> as the package uses net/ethernet.h.
>
> if gencode.c (or any other code) is indee
I ran into this problem when I was trying to compile libpcap with a
package which has support for a custom interface in Linux. I get a
warning message about redefining ETHERMTU while compiling that package
as the package uses net/ethernet.h.
if gencode.c (or any other code) is indeed intended
I understand Linux is not standard but libpcap does support Linux. The
question I have asked is it valid or am I missing something ?
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
gencode.c in libpcap defines ETHERMTU as 1500, is it good to redifine
what standard linux does ? Eg in net/ethernet.h. I understa
Saikiran Madugula wrote:
Am extremely sorry for replying to a mail in the list. I was hoping to
change the subject, but missed it. Re-sending as new email.
--- Original Mail---
gencode.c in libpcap defines ETHERMTU as 1500, is it good to redifine
what standard linux does ? Eg in net/ethernet.h
Am extremely sorry for replying to a mail in the list. I was hoping to
change the subject, but missed it. Re-sending as new email.
--- Original Mail---
gencode.c in libpcap defines ETHERMTU as 1500, is it good to redifine
what standard linux does ? Eg in net/ethernet.h. I understand that
genco
