On 07/29/11 09:49, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:02 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
With Solaris, the interfaces available from the driver and protocol stack
prohibit access to actual packets at the link layer. I don't know if this is or
will be possible with Linux, but if the link layer he
u do not wish the message to be posted, or have other concerns,
please send a message to the list owners at the following address:
tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org
=
Re: [tcpdump-workers] DLT value for IP over IB (Infiniband).eml
Subject:
Re: [tcpdump-workers] DLT v
On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:02 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
> With Solaris, the interfaces available from the driver and protocol stack
> prohibit access to actual packets at the link layer. I don't know if this is
> or will be possible with Linux, but if the link layer header for IPoIB on
> Linux is 12 b
Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 14, 2011, at 5:23 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
Some more follow up on this...
Looks are deceiving - there is no RFC 4391/4392 header being prepended to the
IP packet:
/*
* In order to transmit the datagram to correct destination, an extra
* header including destination a
Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 14, 2011, at 5:23 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
Some more follow up on this...
Looks are deceiving - there is no RFC 4391/4392 header being prepended to the
IP packet:
/*
* In order to transmit the datagram to correct destination, an extra
* header including destination a
On Jul 14, 2011, at 5:23 AM, Darren Reed wrote:
> Some more follow up on this...
>
> Looks are deceiving - there is no RFC 4391/4392 header being prepended to the
> IP packet:
> /*
> * In order to transmit the datagram to correct destination, an extra
> * header including destination address is
Some more follow up on this...
Looks are deceiving - there is no RFC 4391/4392 header being prepended
to the IP packet:
/*
* In order to transmit the datagram to correct destination, an extra
* header including destination address is required. IB does not provide an
* interface for sending a li
Some time ago I requested a DLT value for the IP over IB format of IB
frames.
The interfaces that I'm using on Solaris appear to be compliant with
RFCs 4391
and 4392.
Currently we're using DLT_USER15 internally but given the alignment with the
RFCs, I feel that this should be changed before I
