Re: [tcpdump-workers] A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding DLT_ values

2011-02-03 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:47 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote: > Hello again, > > I have solved almost all the problems that I mentioned below and now I > am sure that I should ask for a new DLT value for STANAG 5066 [1] MAC > (Medium Access Control Sublayer) PDUs. Currently I am able to dissect > these PDU

Re: [tcpdump-workers] A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding DLT_ values

2011-02-03 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:02 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote: > First of all, we're developing radio communication software, > particularly STANAG 5066. Alongside the serial interface for the modem > interface our implementation also has a socket interface for testing > purposes. > > Now we have the need

Re: [tcpdump-workers] A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding DLT_ values

2011-02-03 Thread M.Baris Demiray
Hello again, I have solved almost all the problems that I mentioned below and now I am sure that I should ask for a new DLT value for STANAG 5066 [1] MAC (Medium Access Control Sublayer) PDUs. Currently I am able to dissect these PDUs using DLT number 147 (USER0) using Wireshark 1.4.3 and I'd like

[tcpdump-workers] A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding DLT_ values

2011-01-19 Thread M.Baris Demiray
Hello, I've a couple of questions regarding dissector development and DLT_ values and I hope I know enough to express myself. First of all, we're developing radio communication software, particularly STANAG 5066. Alongside the serial interface for the modem interface our implementation also has a