On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:14 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
>> Indeed, may be you could also add (along with the link to the old
>> unclassified version) that new versions of STANAG 5066 haven't
>> introduced any alterations to D_PDU headers and the
On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:14 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> Indeed, may be you could also add (along with the link to the old
> unclassified version) that new versions of STANAG 5066 haven't
> introduced any alterations to D_PDU headers and the last edition,
> Edition 3, is totally backward compatible
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:41 PM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
>>> Do they begin with the 16-bit synchronization sequence, or is that stripped
>>> off, so that they begin with the header field? Do data PDUs include the
>>> CRC at the end, or is tha
On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:41 PM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>> Do they begin with the 16-bit synchronization sequence, or is that stripped
>> off, so that they begin with the header field? Do data PDUs include the CRC
>> at the end, or is that stripped off?
>
> 16-bit synchronization sequence is sen
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately no, there is not. As in SIS Layer dissector this is also
>> a part of a standard which is available only to NATO member states
>
> Hey, I'm a citizen of a NATO memb
On Feb 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> Unfortunately no, there is not. As in SIS Layer dissector this is also
> a part of a standard which is available only to NATO member states
Hey, I'm a citizen of a NATO member state :-)
> and that therefore we access through an account.
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2011, at 12:25 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
>> In fact this is not what STANAG 5066 Annex H "Implementation Guide and
>> Notes" section suggests. According to this section and the tests held
>> by DRA (Defence Research Agency
On Feb 4, 2011, at 12:25 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> In fact this is not what STANAG 5066 Annex H "Implementation Guide and
> Notes" section suggests. According to this section and the tests held
> by DRA (Defence Research Agency),
>
> 1) The throughput is not strongly sensitive to frame size
>
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:47 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> I have solved almost all the problems that I mentioned below and now I
>> am sure that I should ask for a new DLT value for STANAG 5066 [1] MAC
>> (Medium Access Control
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:02 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
>
>> First of all, we're developing radio communication software,
>> particularly STANAG 5066. Alongside the serial interface for the modem
>> interface our implementation also has a s
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:47 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I have solved almost all the problems that I mentioned below and now I
> am sure that I should ask for a new DLT value for STANAG 5066 [1] MAC
> (Medium Access Control Sublayer) PDUs. Currently I am able to dissect
> these PDU
On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:02 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote:
> First of all, we're developing radio communication software,
> particularly STANAG 5066. Alongside the serial interface for the modem
> interface our implementation also has a socket interface for testing
> purposes.
>
> Now we have the need
Hello again,
I have solved almost all the problems that I mentioned below and now I
am sure that I should ask for a new DLT value for STANAG 5066 [1] MAC
(Medium Access Control Sublayer) PDUs. Currently I am able to dissect
these PDUs using DLT number 147 (USER0) using Wireshark 1.4.3 and I'd
like
Hello,
I've a couple of questions regarding dissector development and DLT_
values and I hope I know enough to express myself.
First of all, we're developing radio communication software,
particularly STANAG 5066. Alongside the serial interface for the modem
interface our implementation also has a
14 matches
Mail list logo
