On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Mcmillan, Scott A wrote:
> As I was testing your changes, I noticed some very minor build issues,
> resolved by this small patch:
Thanks. I've checked your fixes into the trunk and 1.1 branches and pushed
them.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://co
Guy,
Thank you for significantly improving and merging this capability into the
official repository. I fully agree with your changes. I was thinking that way
myself, but was hesitant to propose changes of that degree as my first
contribution.
As I was testing your changes, I noticed some ver
On May 24, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Mcmillan, Scott A wrote:
> This patch adds the capability to select the packet timestamp source. It
> also adds support for the PACKET_TIMESTAMP Linux kernel setting to specify
> the source of packet timestamps. The corresponding Linux kernel patch is
> being sub
Scott
-Original Message-
From: tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org
[mailto:tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:28 PM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
O
fully fall back to sw timestamps.
The updated tcpdump patch I posted simplifies this situation by removing the
option to select the "raw" timestamps.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org
[mailto:tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdum
On May 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Mcmillan, Scott A wrote:
> Both the 'raw' and 'nic' timestamps are in the form of seconds since the Unix
> epoch, plus fractions of a second. Please see my response to Darren for more
> info on the difference between these two timestamp sources.
Which reply was th
On May 24, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Mcmillan, Scott A wrote:
> This patch adds the capability to select the packet timestamp source. It
> also adds support for the PACKET_TIMESTAMP Linux kernel setting to specify
> the source of packet timestamps. The corresponding Linux kernel patch is
> being sub
r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:37 PM
To: Mcmillan, Scott A
Cc: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
Scott,
Is it just the 82580 or others too?
If I look in the source code for OpenSolaris, I see:
igb_
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Mcmillan, Scott A
wrote:
> Guy,
>
> Both the 'raw' and 'nic' timestamps are in the form of seconds since the Unix
> epoch, plus fractions of a second. Please see my response to Darren for more
> info on the difference between these two timestamp sources.
>
> The
Guy Harris wrote:
Is there ever any reason *NOT* to use the hardware timestamp if it's available?
Only if it and the host time are not sufficiently in sync and you want to
correlate with other things timestamped with host time.
rick jones
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod
ren.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:37 PM
To: Mcmillan, Scott A
Cc: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
Scott,
Is it just the 82580 or others too?
If I look in the source code for OpenSolaris, I see:
igb_82575.h:#d
mp-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 8:37 PM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
On May 24, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Mcmillan, Scott A wrote:
> [My apologies if this double post
On May 24, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Mcmillan, Scott A wrote:
> [My apologies if this double posts. The mail server didn't care for the
> first submission.]
>
> This patch adds the capability to select the packet timestamp source.
Is there ever any reason *NOT* to use the hardware timestamp if it's a
Original Message-
From: tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org
[mailto:tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org] On Behalf Of yon ar c'hall
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:41 AM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
Hello S
--Original Message-
From: tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org
[mailto:tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org] On Behalf Of yon ar c'hall
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:41 AM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
Hello
Hello Scott,
By the way, do you know which NICs/network controllers support HW
timestamping for all packets (not only the PTP datagrams -- IEEE 1588) ?
Yon
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Mcmillan, Scott A <
scott.a.mcmil...@intel.com> wrote:
> [My apologies if this double posts. The mail ser
[My apologies if this double posts. The mail server didn't care for the first
submission.]
This patch adds the capability to select the packet timestamp source. It also
adds support for the PACKET_TIMESTAMP Linux kernel setting to specify the
source of packet timestamps. The corresponding Li
17 matches
Mail list logo
