On Apr 14, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
> Cool. BTW, I just found a bug in the print_counters routines - i was
> manipulating based on the size of the pointer rather than the struct to
> which it pointed. in 64-bit (where I'm running) the two were the same,
> but in 32 bit they were not
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:35 -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> > To enable printing of non-expanded samples I've shuffled a bunch of code
> > around and created a bunch of smaller routines to more easily support
> > printing of both expanded and non-expan
On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
> To enable printing of non-expanded samples I've shuffled a bunch of code
> around and created a bunch of smaller routines to more easily support
> printing of both expanded and non-expanded counter and flow samples.
> I've done simple testing of no
To enable printing of non-expanded samples I've shuffled a bunch of code
around and created a bunch of smaller routines to more easily support
printing of both expanded and non-expanded counter and flow samples.
I've done simple testing of non-expanded counter and flow, and expanded
counter, but I
