(blah blah blah *surely* Thunderbird must have some way of arranging
that a particular mailbox have a preferred From address blah blah blah
duplicate post blah blah blah)
David Young wrote:
"Oh." Have we got the stomach for radiotap v2? If big-endian kernels
no longer have to convert fields to
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:02:05PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> "pcap_is_swapped(p)" returns "true" if the capture file you've opened
> was captured on a machine with a different byte order, based on the byte
> order of the magic number - if that matches the byte order of the
> radiotap values, that'
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:32:12PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> Is the cpack.c stuff useful, or potentially useful, for anything other
> than the radiotap stuff?
It is potentially useful, yes, for other extensible, synthetic headers
where CPU and memory bandwidth need to be conserved. I cannot pred
(blah blah blah the other brain fart was sending it from sonic.net again
blah blah blah duplicate message dissector blah blah blah)
Michael Richardson wrote:
You tell me.
We didn't do a 0.8.4 yet, but this sounds like significant enough to
warrant 0.9, but maybe I'm wrong.
Sorry, brain fart,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> "Guy" == Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Guy> Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Okay, so can it get integrated into CVS HEAD, and I will arrange
>> to do a 3.9, 0.9.
Guy> HEAD, or HEAD and x.8 branch?
You tell me.
We didn't do a 0.
(blah blah blah another message sent from the wrong address blah blah
blah duplicate message detector blah blah blah)
Michael Richardson wrote:
Okay, so can it get integrated into CVS HEAD, and I will
arrange to do a 3.9, 0.9.
HEAD, or HEAD and x.8 branch?
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Vi
> "Bruce" == Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >Looks good to me, at least for the top-of-tree (where we require
>> that >the platform support 64-bit integers, and where we define
>> u_int64_t to >be an unsigned 64-bit integer type).
Bruce> It would be nice if we
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:32:12PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> >Looks good to me, at least for the top-of-tree (where we require that
> >the platform support 64-bit integers, and where we define u_int64_t to
> >be an unsigned 64-bit integer type).
It would be nice if we could get this committed and
(blah blah blah duplicate posts blah blah blah thunderbird blah blah
blah multiple accounts blah blah blah)
Guy Harris wrote:
Looks good to me, at least for the top-of-tree (where we require that
the platform support 64-bit integers, and where we define u_int64_t to
be an unsigned 64-bit integer
(Blah blah blah work around duplicate message detector blah blah blah
someday I'll figure out if I can configure Thunderbird to know that all
tcpdump-workers mail should come from my alum.mit.edu address blah blah
blah.)
David Young wrote:
Here is support for radiotap, an extensible radio captu
Here is support for radiotap, an extensible radio capture header for
802.11, in its (hopefully) final form. I made the diffs from the
CVS HEAD.
The main difference from previous radiotap patches (such as those that
appear in FreeBSD) is that it fixes some alignment problems.
Any objections to my
11 matches
Mail list logo
