ubject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Bug in libpcap: savefile.c / get_selectable_fd()
On Mar 19, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Shaked, Nitzan wrote:
> What's next? Realistically speaking, should I hold my breath for those
> changes? (Should I implement them and submit a patch?)
Yes. I can't guarantee
So just to be clear: should I, or shouldn't I, implement the solution I
suggest below and submit a patch?
-Original Message-
From: Shaked, Nitzan
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:57 PM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: RE: [tcpdump-workers] Bug in libpcap: savef
org
[mailto:tcpdump-workers-ow...@lists.tcpdump.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:34 PM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Bug in libpcap: savefile.c /
get_selectable_fd()
On Mar 19, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Shaked, Nitzan wrote:
> 2) I believe the curren
Hello again
Thanks for the reply. With your permission, I'd like to keep this up a
little bit (I am actually quoting not in the original order, to cover
the "easy" part first):
> If that means that you can't tell the difference between "end of file
> on the pipe", "no more packets available righ
Hello all
I hope this mailing list is active, and that this is the right place to post
to. In any case, I believe I have discovered a bug: get_selectable_fd() does
not work well when used with pcap_open_offline(). The symptom is that if you
use, as was the poet's intention, get_selectable_fd()
