Can I get a magic number associated with this format?
Regards,
Dumas Hwang
-Original Message-
From: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 6, 2005 4:20 PM
To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] nanosecond timestamp
Dumas Hwang wrote:
> Yes
Yes, I can use that structure too. Sorry, I am quite new to this. Is
the next step to get the magic number, change Ethereal so that it will
recognize the new magic number and submit the patch?
Regards,
Dumas Hwang
>So the Navtel header should perhaps be
> struct pcaprec_navt
32 ts_nsec;/* timestamp nanoseconds */
};
Regards,
Dumas Hwang
> Should I add a new struct and request a new magic number? I would
> think many people
> need nanosecond resolution (if not picosecond).
That's probably a reasonable short-term answer, if you need this soon.
eople
need nanosecond resolution (if not picosecond). Has this been done
before?
Regards,
Dumas Hwang
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Hi!
I would like to request two new link layer types for Generic
Framing Procedure (DLT_GFP_T and DLT_GFP_F). Thank you.
Regards,
Dumas Hwang
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
