Guy Harris alum.mit.edu> writes:
> I'd file the libpcap bug about the filter man page first, and then
> close the tcpdump one about the expression section of the tcpdump man
> page as a duplicate of the new libpcap bug. If, when you close a bug
> as a duplicate, you can't specify the bug i
Guy Harris alum.mit.edu> writes:
> SourceForge said comments were closed when they really meant "you have
> to be logged in to make comments"? That's *REALLY* stupid, but error
> reporting always seems to be one of the worst parts of software -
> people want to work on the parts of the cod
> SourceForge said comments were closed when they really meant "you have
> to be logged in to make comments"? That's *REALLY* stupid, but error
> reporting always seems to be one of the worst parts of software -
> people want to work on the parts of the code where things work, and
> handli
> No - that section of the manual refers to selecting an interface, not
> to matching packets when filtering.
>
> As far as I can tell, "ties are broken by choosing the earliest match"
> means "for some reason, we didn't just say that the first interface in
> the list is used".
>
Thanks. I
Yes, the comments have been definitely disabled, for me. This is what I see
there
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2813234&group_id=53066&atid=469573),
on a wonderful yellow background:
Comments have been closed for this artifact.
Also, the list subscription instructions on h
Please explain what this means, -i in manual: "Ties are broken by
choosing the earliest match." Ties between what and what? Match, I
suppose, is between the tcpdump expression and packets headers.
I answer here to guy_harris on
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2813234&group_id=5306
