Cheers Guy and thank You for all Your assistance.
--
Damir Franusic
http://socket.hr
http://github.com/dfranusic
On May 17, 2019 11:05:48 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Harris wrote:
>On May 17, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Damir Franusic
>wrote:
>
>> Can we conclude this and make a nek LINKTYPE_ entry linked to thi
On May 17, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Damir Franusic wrote:
> Can we conclude this and make a nek LINKTYPE_ entry linked to this draft?
OK, I've added LINKTYPE_ELEE/DLT_ELEE, with a value of 286.
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.or
Well since it's a draft and I am only targeting the group I think this will be
ok:
http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=http://socket.hr/draft-dfranusic-opsawg-elee-00.xml&modeAsFormat=html/ascii
Can we conclude this and make a nek LINKTYPE_ entry linked to this draft?
--
Da
On May 17, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Damir Franusic wrote:
> Hmm In wouldn't want to ask for a new group but from all the those groups,
> opsawg seems somehow appropriate, or maybe not?
Well, there is at least one lawful intercept related I-D from that group:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draf
Hmm In wouldn't want to ask for a new group but from all the those groups,
opsawg seems somehow appropriate, or maybe not?
--
Damir Franusic
http://socket.hr
http://github.com/dfranusic
On May 17, 2019 10:26:42 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Harris wrote:
>On May 17, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Damir Franusic
>wr
On May 17, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Damir Franusic wrote:
> I apologize for my previous mail, issues with email client. What I wanted to
> ask is whether I should name the draft like this:
>
> draft-dfranusic-tsvwg-elee-00
See
https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/guidelines/#7
If you're targ
On May 12, 2019, at 2:33 PM, Damir Franusic wrote:
> You know a lot about this RFC process than I do.
A small amount, maybe, but definitely not a lot.
What I know I found out by doing a Web search for
internet-draft process
and reading pages on IETF Web sites.
See, for example:
I apologize for my previous mail, issues with email client. What I wanted to
ask is whether I should name the draft like this:
draft-dfranusic-tsvwg-elee-00
Thanks,
--
Damir Franusic
http://socket.hr
http://github.com/dfranusic
On May 17, 2019 8:29:34 PM GMT+02:00, Damir Franusic
wrote:
>Hi
Hi Guy
I have a question regarding the target working group. Since this is a
Link Layer transport protocol
for Lawful Interception Data which can also use SCTP for transport,
should I use the following naming
scheme**instead:***draft-dfranusic-**tsvwg-00 *
What you you suggest?
*
*
On 5/15
