Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 23 13:30:55, g...@alum.mit.edu wrote: > On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > > > From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools > > amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g. > > http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/configure does?

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Stephen Donnelly
>Behalf Of Francois-Xavier Le Bail >On 23/07/2018 15:33, Michael Richardson wrote: >> Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-security wrote: >> > Need autoreconf. >> > And 1.9.1 ? >> >> Let's do 1.9.1 in September. > >Why not this week to have a proper version tag ? Agreed, seems like a simpl

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Metamako DLT Request

2018-07-23 Thread Guy Harris
On Jul 23, 2018, at 6:36 PM, David Mirabito wrote: > We'd like to request a new DLT_ value for Metamako's packet capture trailer > that is generated by our MetaWatch network application. > > https://www.metamako.com/applications/metawatch-app.html > > It is a variable length data trailer,

[tcpdump-workers] Metamako DLT Request

2018-07-23 Thread David Mirabito
[ Resending for a colleague who was not a subscriber and whose mail may have bounced. Apologies in advance for any duplication ] Hi, We'd like to request a new DLT_ value for Metamako's packet capture trailer that is generated by our MetaWatch network application. https://www.metamako.com

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Precompiled binaries or compile script needed for Android

2018-07-23 Thread enh
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 2:34 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > enh wrote: > >> secur...@tcpdump.org is not an appropriate place to ask about > binaries. > >> Sometime on tcpdump-workers might be able to help you. > >> https://www.androidtcpdump.com/ also is around. > >> I don't kn

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Guy Harris
On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Jan Stary wrote: > From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools > amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g. > http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/configure does? What advantage would it give us that would make it wo

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Jan, Am 23.07.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Jan Stary : > > From both a sysadmin and user perspective, I find the GNU autotools > amd CMake a major annoyance. Would you please consider doing what e.g. > http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/configure does? > > A simple, hand written shell script, with

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 23 18:38:17, g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:35:30AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Let's switch over to cmake as our official mechanism now... i.e. have > > travis, etc. use it in preference to configure. > > From a sysadmin perspective, I find cmake

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi, Am 23.07.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Ray Bellis : > On 23/07/2018 17:38, Gert Doering wrote: >> I do understand that this is not for me to decide and that you're >> fully free to ignore me, but I still wanted to say it so nobody can >> say afterwards "hey, we announced this on the list and nobody sp

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Francois-Xavier Le Bail
On 23/07/2018 15:33, Michael Richardson wrote: > Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-security wrote: > > Hello, > > > We have in 1.9.0 branch: > > > $ git grep '1\.9\.0-PRE-GIT' > > configure:# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69 for pcap 1.9.0-PRE-GIT. > > configure:PACKAGE_VERSIO

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Ray Bellis
On 23/07/2018 17:38, Gert Doering wrote: > I do understand that this is not for me to decide and that you're > fully free to ignore me, but I still wanted to say it so nobody can > say afterwards "hey, we announced this on the list and nobody spoke > up". FWIW, I loath CMake too. :p Ray

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:35:30AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > Let's switch over to cmake as our official mechanism now... i.e. have > travis, etc. use it in preference to configure. From a sysadmin perspective, I find cmake to be a major annoyance (because it usually does not exist on

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump-security] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Michael Richardson
Guy Harris via tcpdump-security wrote: >>> Need autoreconf. > I've updated libpcap-release-howto.md, in the >g...@bpf.tcpdump.org:maintainer-notes repository, to include the >autoreconf step (and to clean up the formatting, to work as standard >Markdown, as well as replacing t

[tcpdump-workers] [libpcap] Problem with version 1.9.0

2018-07-23 Thread Michael Richardson
Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-security wrote: > Hello, > We have in 1.9.0 branch: > $ git grep '1\.9\.0-PRE-GIT' > configure:# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69 for pcap 1.9.0-PRE-GIT. > configure:PACKAGE_VERSION='1.9.0-PRE-GIT' > configure:PACKAGE_STRING='pcap 1.9.0-PR