On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Christian Rupp
wrote:
> Tcpdump is printing a good timestamp wrong, as far as i can tell.
So did you build tcpdump from source, or is this a binary version from your
Linux distribution? Which version of tcpdump is this?
___
Yes the tenth digit, sorry English isn't my first language. SO yes 1.05
is printed as 1.5
Tcpdump is printing a good timestamp wrong, as far as i can tell.
The Timestamp in itself, if the 0 would be there, would be completely
okay and would make sense.
Am 28.07.2016 um 20:50 schrieb Guy Har
On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Christian
wrote:
> I have encountered a problem.
>
> I am capturing Packages with hardware timestamps and nanosecond
> precision...but the timestamps are bugged.
>
> sadly I'm not at the place where I captured the data, so the used used
> command might be slightl
Hello Guys.
I have encountered a problem.
I am capturing Packages with hardware timestamps and nanosecond
precision...but the timestamps are bugged.
sadly I'm not at the place where I captured the data, so the used used
command might be slightly different, as I have to work from my memory:
t
