On May 21, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd
> rather do that than have "old stable". I'd rather call them something like:
> wheezy-4.7
> or centos7-4.7
So, if both Chocolate Coated Spinach Linux "O
There was a discussion about what branches to possibly backport fixes to.
Guy has related:
Guy Harris wrote:
> Wireshark has:
> https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle
> * the current development branch (master, trunk, whatever);
> * the current stable branch (currentl
