On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> We can support very old systems today, although some of them get little
> testing. Upgrading tcpdump from source code is on a really old system
> (that can not be replaced...) in order to diagnose what went wrong is a
> common occurance.
Michal Sekletar wrote:
> But is this gonna work in the long run? If there are issues with build
> system which are not possible to workaround and prevent us from using
> new versions of
There is very little skew in what tcpdump needs from a system.
The question is really: do we need
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:41:45PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> > But it means that anyone who checks out code from git is foobar if they can
> > not get the *correct* version of autoconf installed to generate the files.
>
> So, if it'
