On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:36 -0800, Ani Sinha wrote:
>> >
>> > It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
> If you want to test ANCILLARY possible values, its already too late, as
> old kernels wont use any patch an
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:36 -0800, Ani Sinha wrote:
>> >
>> > It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
>> > extensions by attempting to load a filter that uses them. As only valid
>> > filters can be loaded, old
>
> It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
> extensions by attempting to load a filter that uses them. As only valid
> filters can be loaded, old kernels that do not support filtering of vlan
> tags will fail to load the a test filter with uses them.
Unfortunately
On 12/11/2012 05:58 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:38:29PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Rick" == Rick Jones writes:
Rick> Is there a version of tcpdump in the works which will decode
Rick> the unecrypted
Rick> portions of an SSL/TLS session? Or do I
