On 12 January 2012 10:38, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Akos Vandra wrote:
>
>> We could put a limit - say 32 or 64 chars - to the max length of the
>> param, and then allocate in on the stack, but it would still require
>> printf.
>
> Where would that be done? It's a little
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Akos Vandra wrote:
> We could put a limit - say 32 or 64 chars - to the max length of the
> param, and then allocate in on the stack, but it would still require
> printf.
Where would that be done? It's a little more convenient than using routines
such as asprintf()
We could put a limit - say 32 or 64 chars - to the max length of the
param, and then allocate in on the stack, but it would still require
printf.
In this form, as we are going to have a single interface function to
set and read the parameter, some serialization and deserialization of
the data is ne
