On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> libpcap has had support for pcap ng files since early 2010. Such
> files can contain timestamps with resolutions more precise than
> microseconds. From my reading of the code, it appears that when
> libpcap reads from such a file, it converts
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Akos Vandra wrote:
> So my questions are:
> - What are the steps needed to 'nicely' add support to a new device?
If your new device requires a new link-layer header type (which this one does,
as per the discussion on the wireshark-dev list), you need to get one ass
On Dec 20, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Akos Vandra wrote:
> When building wireshark based on the new libpcap with my module using
> libusb-1.0, it didn't build, because it was missing symbols
> (naturally, as wireshark didn't know it has to link libusb-1.0 as
> well). So insted of digging into where I have
On Dec 21, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>> "David" == David Ward
>>
>> writes:
>David> I'm sending a couple of fixes to the 'inbound' and 'outbound'
>David> filters in libpcap affecting Linux. I have compiled and
>David> tested under Linux as well as F
On Dec 21, 2011, at 9:02 AM, David Laight wrote:
> I thought Berkley had made a general statement that
> some of those clauses (esp. the advertising one) could
> be removed??
The statement made by the Directory of Technology Licensing at UCB was:
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/READM
> "David" == David Laight writes:
>> Tyson Key gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > As far as I'm aware, TCPDump is released under the terms of the
>> BSD
David> Licence
>> > - meaning that Nokia haven't got any obligations regarding
>> releasing
David> their
>> >
> "Chris" == Chris Maynard writes:
Chris> Tyson Key gmail.com> writes:
>> As far as I'm aware, TCPDump is released under the terms of the
>> BSD Licence - meaning that Nokia haven't got any obligations
>> regarding releasing their modifications; and whilst it's not the
>
Chris Maynard wrote:
> Tyson Key gmail.com> writes:
>
> > As far as I'm aware, TCPDump is released under the terms of the BSD
Licence
> > - meaning that Nokia haven't got any obligations regarding releasing
their
> > modifications; and whilst it's not the most reliable information
source on
> >
Tyson Key gmail.com> writes:
> As far as I'm aware, TCPDump is released under the terms of the BSD Licence
> - meaning that Nokia haven't got any obligations regarding releasing their
> modifications; and whilst it's not the most reliable information source on
> the planet, Wikipedia seems to cor
For what it's worth, you could try asking Petra Söderling (
petra.soderl...@nokia.com) - who happens to head some of the Open Source
initiatives at Nokia.
Tyson.
On 21 December 2011 16:20, Chris Maynard wrote:
> If I visit http://www.wireshark.org/, I can find the GPL license without
> too
> mu
> "David" == David Ward
>
> writes:
David> I'm sending a couple of fixes to the 'inbound' and 'outbound'
David> filters in libpcap affecting Linux. I have compiled and
David> tested under Linux as well as FreeBSD (to make sure it
David> doesn't affect non-Linux build
Hi Chris,
As far as I'm aware, TCPDump is released under the terms of the BSD Licence
- meaning that Nokia haven't got any obligations regarding releasing their
modifications; and whilst it's not the most reliable information source on
the planet, Wikipedia seems to corroborate that thought.
I ho
If I visit http://www.wireshark.org/, I can find the GPL license without too
much searching at the bottom of this page: http://www.wireshark.org/about.html.
I can't seem to find the tcpdump/libpcap license mentioned anywhere on
http://www.tcpdump.org/. Is it mentioned somewhere and I'm just missi
13 matches
Mail list logo
