Thanks to some traces sent my way by Gavin McCullagh, and a comparison
against the output of inMon's sflowtool, I can confidently say "Yes
Virginia, there is an enterprise other than zero." Which means lest we
start trying to decode something as what it is not, we best actually
look at the enterpr
On Apr 14, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
> Cool. BTW, I just found a bug in the print_counters routines - i was
> manipulating based on the size of the pointer rather than the struct to
> which it pointed. in 64-bit (where I'm running) the two were the same,
> but in 32 bit they were not
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:35 -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> > To enable printing of non-expanded samples I've shuffled a bunch of code
> > around and created a bunch of smaller routines to more easily support
> > printing of both expanded and non-expan
On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
> To enable printing of non-expanded samples I've shuffled a bunch of code
> around and created a bunch of smaller routines to more easily support
> printing of both expanded and non-expanded counter and flow samples.
> I've done simple testing of no
