Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap_next_ex calls pcap_oneshot instead of p->oneshot_callback

2011-02-04 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 4, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Tobias C Rittweiler wrote: > In the latest release as well as git HEAD, pcap_next_ex > calls pcap_oneshot (the default callback) instead of > p->oneshot_callback like pcap_next does. > > This means that packets change underneath one application > when using Linux and

[tcpdump-workers] pcap_next_ex calls pcap_oneshot instead of p->oneshot_callback

2011-02-04 Thread Tobias C Rittweiler
Hi there! In the latest release as well as git HEAD, pcap_next_ex calls pcap_oneshot (the default callback) instead of p->oneshot_callback like pcap_next does. This means that packets change underneath one application when using Linux and its mmapped ring buffer. Additionally, I think the manpa

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector

2011-02-04 Thread Schemmel , Hans-Christoph
Guy Harris alum.mit.edu> writes: > > OK, so it's: > > Header_Size: 1 octet > > A sequence of zero or more instances of: > > Msg_ID: 2 octets > > Freq_ID: 2 octets > > Start_Pos: 1 octet > > End_Pos: 1 octet > >

Re: [tcpdump-workers] A puzzled maintainer with questions regarding

2011-02-04 Thread M.Baris Demiray
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:47 AM, M.Baris Demiray wrote: > >> Hello again, >> >> I have solved almost all the problems that I mentioned below and now I >> am sure that I should ask for a new DLT value for STANAG 5066 [1] MAC >> (Medium Access Control