Guy Harris alum.mit.edu> writes:
>
> OK, so it sounds as if this isn't raw standard 27.010 traffic. Is MUX27010
likely to be used as a name for that
> traffic? If not, we could call it DLT_MUX27010/LINKTYPE_MUX27010.
>
> What is the format of the additional header?-
> This is the tcpdump-work
Hello,
I've a couple of questions regarding dissector development and DLT_
values and I hope I know enough to express myself.
First of all, we're developing radio communication software,
particularly STANAG 5066. Alongside the serial interface for the modem
interface our implementation also has a
