On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Schemmel, Hans-Christoph wrote:
> A packet begins with a flag (octet 0xF9, section 5.2.1.1), followed by address
> and control field.
Is this DLT value only for the Basic Option, or is it also used for the
Advanced Option? If it's also for the Advanced Option:
On Jan 11, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Tim Sammut wrote:
> Is this a known issue,
It was not known to me until now.
> or is there a more correct workaround?
None that I know of.
I'm looking at a change that should fix this without breaking any reasonable
code, although I'm sure somebody will have fig
Guy Harris alum.mit.edu> writes:
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:16 AM, Schemmel, Hans-Christoph wrote:
>
> > I´ve written a dissector (MUX27010) for wireshark and I want to commit it to
the project. Therefore I need
> a new DLT value for this dissector/protocol because the protocol doesn´t base
u
Good morning,
Do newer version of tcpdump no longer show TCP sequence numbers without the -vv
flag? Or is this some kind of FreeBSD bug?
FreeBSD 7.2 (tcpdump 3.9.7):
07:06:47.765297 IP x.x.x.x.58894 > 209.87.252.181.443: P 285:344(59) ack 1589
win 16695
07:06:47.827029 IP 209.87.252.181.443 >
Hello.
I have an odd problem and I am hoping you all can help.
It appears that starting in the Linux system headers around version
2.6.36 [1], /usr/include/linux/if_tun.h began including
/usr/include/linux/filter.h [2]. filter.h however, defines
BPF_MAJOR_VERSION which ends up excluding the entir
