Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector

2011-01-10 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:16 AM, Schemmel, Hans-Christoph wrote: > I´ve written a dissector (MUX27010) for wireshark and I want to commit it to > the project. Therefore I need a new DLT value for this dissector/protocol > because the protocol doesn´t base upon another data link layer protocol. > Wh

[tcpdump-workers] Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector

2011-01-10 Thread Schemmel, Hans-Christoph
Hi, I´ve written a dissector (MUX27010) for wireshark and I want to commit it to the project. Therefore I need a new DLT value for this dissector/protocol because the protocol doesn´t base upon another data link layer protocol. What the dissector does: It analyses a multiplexed communication bet

Re: [tcpdump-workers] reconstruct HTTP requests in custom sniffer

2011-01-10 Thread Andrej van der Zee
Hi Cedric, > Support for TCP segmentation as well as new parsers that use this > feature should be pushed before end of week. Concerning the capture of > POST messages we should probably start working on this in february (this > is a small company so no schedule is ever definitive, so no promise)

Re: [tcpdump-workers] reconstruct HTTP requests in custom sniffer

2011-01-10 Thread Cedric Cellier
-[ Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:19:53PM +0900, Andrej van der Zee ] > Is there anything to say about a rough time-schedule? Support for TCP segmentation as well as new parsers that use this feature should be pushed before end of week. Concerning the capture of POST messages we should probably start