On Oct 8, 2009, at 3:59 AM,
wrote:
1.)
I'd urgently need help/advice of how the following filter string has
to
be to be set as winpcap filter-string:
I can't find any working string for the protocols. "eth src
00:0e:0C:76:86:5e" is working.
Thanks for any reply and help
My filter in
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
I do not know if there are any AIX users left.
For me, it's been at least 15 years since I had one with a compiler.
(Not counting the VIO LPAR server on IBM pSeries...)
I wonder if we can even maintain this branch of pcap at this point?
W
On Oct 8, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Jean-Louis CHARTON wrote:
Am I right?
Almost certainly - I'm not an AIX expert, but I don't see any reason
why you *wouldn't* be right.
I've checked in and pushed your changes on the main Git branch.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandel
On Oct 9, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Jean-Louis CHARTON wrote:
BTW, does someone know why the number of BPF devices is limited to 4
(at least
on AIX)?
Because the people at IBM who maintain AIX's BPF and tcpdump/libpcap
don't have a clue? That's certainly the impression I get, from
1) the fact
On Oct 9, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Tillmann Werner wrote:
No, but it sounds like you are using Linux and your kernel's raw
socket
interface does not support PF_PACKET.
Nope. That message comes if a setsockopt(fd, SOL_PACKET,
PACKET_RX_RING, ...) fails on a PF_PACKET socket FD - if the kernel
No, but it sounds like you are using Linux and your kernel's raw socket
interface does not support PF_PACKET. Maybe that helps.
Tillmann
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
I do not know if there are any AIX users left.
For me, it's been at least 15 years since I had one with a compiler.
(Not counting the VIO LPAR server on IBM pSeries...)
I wonder if we can even maintain this branch of pcap at this point?
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!
BTW, does someone know why the number of BPF devices is limited to 4 (at least
on AIX)? Is there a technical reason for this ?
I've tried to add one more bpf device (/dev/bpf4) on an AIX 5.1 box. The device
configuration seems ok (i.e. the sysconfig() calls are successfull). I can
launch up to 4
Felix Obenhuber wrote:
2. The can frame struct is defined like this (from linux/can.h):
/**
* struct can_frame - basic CAN frame structure
* @can_id: the CAN ID of the frame and CAN_*_FLAG flags, see above.
* @can_dlc: the data length field of the CAN frame
* @data:the CAN frame payload.
