Re: [tcpdump-workers] Should the default snapshot length in tcpdump be 65535?

2009-02-21 Thread Ken Bantoft
On 21-Feb-09, at 4:49 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: "Guy" == Guy Harris writes: Guy> The "tcp" in "tcpdump" is a bit old - people use it for doing Guy> more than just looking at TCP headers these days - and it I wanted to release a program called "netdump" which would use libnetdiss

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Should the default snapshot length in tcpdump be 65535?

2009-02-21 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Guy" == Guy Harris writes: Guy> The "tcp" in "tcpdump" is a bit old - people use it for doing Guy> more than just looking at TCP headers these days - and it I wanted to release a program called "netdump" which would use libnetdissect, and start anew option-wise. We have lots of

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Should the default snapshot length in tcpdump

2009-02-21 Thread Eloy Paris
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:46:25PM -0800, Aaron Turner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > > The "tcp" in "tcpdump" is a bit old - people use it for doing more > > than just looking at TCP headers these days - and it sounds as if > > the problem Torsten Krah had tring