Hi,
I uploaded Release Candidate 3 to http://www.tcpdump.org/beta this
afternoon - only changes since rc2 are Guy's revised man pages for
libpcap - nothing changed in tcpdump (other than the version#).
If there continues to be no complains, I'll issue Tcpdump 4.0.0 and
1.0.0 finals on M
> "Tyler" == Tyler J Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tyler> Do you mean something like utmp(5)? If so, I think I can
Tyler> take on the drudgery of writing that. Unless pcap files have
Tyler> become a lot more complicated since 0.8.
THANK YOU!
--
] ON HUMILITY: to e
> "Guy" == Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (Gerald, you're on tcpdump-workers
Guy> (Ignore randomness; I wasn't sure why you were CCed on Phil's
Guy> response, but you presumably wouldn't have seen his original
Guy> message if you weren't on tcpdump-workers.
Guy
On 23-Oct-08, at 3:12 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Ken Bantoft wrote:
Yes, it should - I'll put it in for rc3, along with anything else.
I want 4.0.0/1.0.0 released by Halloween... preferably before!
So presumably there will be bug-fix dot-dot releases, such as
4.
On Oct 16, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2008 20:39:39 Guy Harris wrote:
I've considered biting the bullet and writing up a pcap(5) man page,
as part of libpcap. Libpcap 1.0 will probably come out later this
month, so perhaps it's time to write it.
Do you m
On Oct 17, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Ken Bantoft wrote:
Yes, it should - I'll put it in for rc3, along with anything else.
I want 4.0.0/1.0.0 released by Halloween... preferably before!
So presumably there will be bug-fix dot-dot releases, such as
4.0.1/1.0.1, 4.0.2/1.0.2, etc..
What would the
