On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 02:56:11AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Phil Vandry wrote:
>
> >I was thinking it would belong in the standard tree (RFC4288 3.1).
> >This
> >requires writing an RFC.
>
> At least as I read RFC 4288, that applies only to proposals that come
On 16-Oct-08, at 4:06 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
Note to Linux distributions and *BSD systems that include libpcap:
There's now a rule to make a shared library, which should work on
Linux and *BSD (and OS X).
It sets the soname of the library to "libpcap.so.1"; this is what
it should be,
On Oct 16, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Phil Vandry wrote:
I was thinking it would belong in the standard tree (RFC4288 3.1).
This
requires writing an RFC.
At least as I read RFC 4288, that applies only to proposals that come
from the IETF; all that's needed is *some* published standard:
4.10.
