Re: [tcpdump-workers] New DLT_ value request

2007-12-19 Thread Guy Harris
On Dec 18, 2007, at 2:46 AM, Will Barker wrote: OK - can we go for: "zero means received, non-zero means sent" ...and 4 bytes long, as per the earlier discussion, or just 1 byte (or 2 bytes)? Hopefully by "version-specific" you don't mean "specific to the versions of libpcap and Wiresh

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Loosing half the conversion when any BFP is used

2007-12-19 Thread Guy Harris
On Dec 19, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Bill Richardson wrote: Looking at the one system that works I see it is related to Vlan tagging: Is the "test.pcap" file the same file in all three examples? If so, does the "From ..." at the end of the command indicate the machine on which you're running tcpd

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Loosing half the conversion when any BFP is used

2007-12-19 Thread Bill Richardson
Looking at the one system that works I see it is related to Vlan tagging: tcpdump -r test.pcap -nn host 172.21.89.75 "From BigIp box" 08:05:28.729250 802.1Q vlan#88 P0 172.21.89.75.4000 > 172.21.89.70.45647: . 1555:1569(14) ack 3496 win 202 08:05:28.729258 172.21.89.70.45647 > 172.21.89.75.4000: .

[tcpdump-workers] Loosing half the conversion when any BFP is used

2007-12-19 Thread Bill Richardson
This may not be the right list to ask but thought I would give this a try. I have looked and looked and have not seen anyone with this problem. In the past I have been able to take large inclusive tcpdump files and read them back in with the -r option using tcpdump and BFP them to a host or port