Gianluca Varenni wrote:
why not using a different return value instead of a string message which
is human readable but not easily computer readable?
Probably because that's the way that other pcap APIs work. That doesn't
mean it's the *right* way to work, it just means it fits in with the wa
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Dupuy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] enable memory mapped access to
ethernet device for linux
Guy Harris asked:
How does pcap_setbufsize() differ from pcap_setbuff()?
Guy Harris asked:
How does pcap_setbufsize() differ from pcap_setbuff()?
The WinPcap pcap_setbuff function is defined as:
int pcap_setbuff(pcap_t *p, int dim);
I declared it as follows:
extern int pcap_setbufsize(pcap_t *p, int bufsize, char *errbuf);
extern int pcap_getbufsize(pcap_t *p, ch
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Peter Losher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joao Damas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump patches...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
