on Thu 9/13/2007 12:51 AM Ken Bantoft wrote:
> Just a heads up - we're releasing 3.9.8 / 0.9.8 this week, currently
> based off CVS as of 2007-09-13 00:00 GMT.
I have at least a patch pending that I like to see in. Is there any chance to
get
the patch I posted on 2007-09-11 ('wrong copyright o
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Ken Bantoft wrote:
Just a heads up - we're releasing 3.9.8 / 0.9.8 this week, currently based
off CVS as of 2007-09-13 00:00 GMT.
This will probably be the last of the 3.x.x/0.x.x releases - check your
archives for "tcpdump 4.xx preperations" email of 2007-08-31 for detail
Just a heads up - we're releasing 3.9.8 / 0.9.8 this week, currently
based off CVS as of 2007-09-13 00:00 GMT.
This will probably be the last of the 3.x.x/0.x.x releases - check
your archives for "tcpdump 4.xx preperations" email of 2007-08-31 for
details of the changes for 4.x.x and 1.x
On Sep 3, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Max Laier wrote:
Sorry for dropping the ball on this one. Please see attached for the
updated diffs. After this "pf.h" can be removed from the sources as
it
is no longer referenced.
Checked in, with pf.h nuked in both libpcap and tcpdump, FILES and
INSTALL/I
On Sunday 08 July 2007, Guy Harris wrote:
...
> As such, I'd be willing to check the change in - if it were modified
> to completely remove DLT_PFLOG support if there is no
> header, as a change to make it handle only headers
> for the OS and version on which it's built would imply no support if
>
Thanks a lot for that detailed explanation.
Indeed wireshark dissected these correctly when using "decode as.. RPC"
Cheers,
On 9/5/07, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alex Still wrote:
>
> > We're using tcpdump to try to diagnose an NFS performance problem.
> > We're seeing a lot of the
