David Young wrote:
I need a metadata header for WiMAX common-part sublayer. I see that
802.16 CPS has a DLT already allocated, which is a good start.
...
1. Allocate another DLT specifically for Radiotap+WiMAX
I think #1 is reasonable. That is the way 802.11 works. That is,
the DLT influenc
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:20:42PM -0400, Charles Clancy wrote:
> I need a metadata header for WiMAX common-part sublayer. I see that
> 802.16 CPS has a DLT already allocated, which is a good start.
>
> It seemed logical to extend the Radiotap header with some WiMAX-specific
> fields, and reuse m
Charles Clancy wrote:
1. Allocate another DLT specifically for Radiotap+WiMAX
2. Extend the Radiotap header to indicate what protocol it's encapsulating
3. Don't use Radiotap, and develop something else
What's the group's thoughts on these options, and which would be most
preferred? #1 seems
I need a metadata header for WiMAX common-part sublayer. I see that
802.16 CPS has a DLT already allocated, which is a good start.
It seemed logical to extend the Radiotap header with some WiMAX-specific
fields, and reuse much of the existing infrastructure, however the
Radiotap header has no way
