Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged

2007-05-02 Thread Luis Martin Garcia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > Would a patch to move the capture syntax into its own manpage and into > the libpcap package be acceptable? If so, I'm willing to produce one. > > ciao >Joerg > I agree. I am developing an application that uses libpcap and It didn't make an

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged

2007-05-02 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:53:02AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > However, I'm not sure the libpcap man page is the right place, either, > as it'll be lost amidst a bunch of details of interest only to people > writing code that uses libpcap. pcap-filter(4) will be it for the start then. ciao Jo

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged

2007-05-02 Thread Guy Harris
Joerg Mayer wrote: Well, it's not a bug per se, but I really think that the capture syntax manpage should be part of libpcap and not of tcpdump. I know of a few systems that have wireshark installed but not tcpdump. Also, it is possible to build tcpdump with older versions of libpcap where the c

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged as untagged frames with an ip-filter

2007-05-02 Thread Michael Richardson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Joerg" == Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joerg> Well, it's not a bug per se, but I really think that the Joerg> capture syntax manpage should be part of libpcap and not of Joerg> tcpdump. I know of a few systems that have w

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Filtering both vlan-tagged as untagged frames with an ip-filter

2007-05-02 Thread Joerg Mayer
>From a thread at wireshark-users, but this concerns libpcap. On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:38:26PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > Does it count as a bug if it's documented to work that way? :-) > > To quote the OS X 10.4.9 tcpdump man page (this isn't WinPcap-specific - > it's common to all libpcap/Wi