Florian Weimer wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Have you already requested a new CVE
name?
Is one needed? The page at
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-1218
says
Off-by-one buffer overflow in the parse_elements function in the 802.11
printer code (print-802_11.c)
* Guy Harris:
> Albert Chin wrote:
>> Is CVE-2007-1218 applicable to tcpdump 3.9.4? Doesn't seem so as the
>> line in the following patch was added after 3.9.4:
>
> The problem in 3.9.5 was that the line was wrong.
>
> The problem in 3.9.4 and before was that the line was *absent*.
Thanks for the
