FW: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Help on Ethernet Size

2007-03-06 Thread ARAMBULO, Norman R.
Ok so it a lot of work, Can wireshark show the calling/called number vice-versa? I wanna sniff the calling/called numbers in our H323 voip calls.. So what language can you recommend using for such task? for Thanks From: Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:31:46 -0800 On Mar 6,

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Help on Ethernet Size

2007-03-06 Thread ARAMBULO, Norman R.
Thanks for the enlightenment that helps a lot... Another thing how can I parse a voip call (h323 family, SIP, IAX etc.) Is wireshark capable of doing it. Can somebody send me a source code for parsing voip call in C language. Thank and more power -Original Message- From: [EMAIL P

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Wireshark-users] Help on Ethernet Size

2007-03-06 Thread Guy Harris
(the -request address for a mailing list is for requests to be added to or removed from a mailing list; it is not for messages sent to the list itself) On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:36 PM, ARAMBULO, Norman R. wrote: Is the ethernet size always equal to 14 bytes? The lowest-layer Ethernet header is

[tcpdump-workers] CVE-2007-1218 applicable to tcpdump 3.9.4?

2007-03-06 Thread Albert Chin
Is CVE-2007-1218 applicable to tcpdump 3.9.4? Doesn't seem so as the line in the following patch was added after 3.9.4: Index: print-802_11.c === RCS file: /tcpdump/master/tcpdump/print-802_11.c,v retrieving revision 1.31.2.11 retriev